Corporate Codes of Ethics - The How Factor
Although recognized as a key factor for its effectiveness, the adopted process for the development of a global corporate code of ethics, is one of the least documented aspects by Academia.
The code is often created at central level and then sent for adoption and implementation to the different branches within the organisation, and the fact that they are not involved in the development process, frequently elicits resistance and compromises effectiveness.
This was initially the case with the company of this study, where it was found that business units from different geographical locations had gradually made adaptations to the original code of the Group, which no longer remained the same across countries, neither in text nor in form, which led to the code review.
Developed through an action-research methodology, this case study describes the review process which included 30 people from all the Group companies. All defined goals have been achieved. The different companies’ representatives consider that the participatory methodology was a key-factor to the general acceptance of the produced document. Three years after the code release, its efficacy was also evaluated with the Ethics Ombudsman who presented possible success indicators.
Calderón, R., Ferrero, I., & Redin, D. M. (2012). Ethical codes and corporate responsibility of the most admired companies of the world: Toward a third generation ethics? Business and Politics, 14(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2012-0044
Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2005). Doing Action Researshe in Your Own Organization. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Czarniawska, B. (1997). Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Erwin, P. M. (2011). Corporate Codes of Conduct: The Effects of Code Content and Quality on Ethical Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4), 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0667-y
Helin, S., & Babri, M. (2015). Travelling with a code of ethics: A contextual study of a Swedish MNC auditing a Chinese supplier. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.056
Helin, S., & Sandström, J. (2008). Codes, ethics and cross-cultural differences: stories from the implementation of a corporate code of ethics in a MNC subsidiary. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9887-9
Kaptein, M. (2004). Business codes of multinationals. What do they say? Journal of Business Ethics, 1(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000021051.53460.da
Kaptein, M. (2015). The Living Code: Embedding Ethics into the Corporate DNA. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2652863
Kaptein, Muel, & Schwartz, M. S. (2008). The effectiveness of business codes: A critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9305-0
Martens, L. T. (2005). Writing an Effective Global Code. International Business Ethics Review, 8(1), 9–14.
Messikomer, C. M., & Cirka, C. C. (2010). Constructing a Code of Ethics: An Experiential Case of a National Professional Organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0347-y
Moreira, J. M. (2002). A Contas com a Ética Empresarial. Cascais: Principia.
Poulton, M. S. (2005). Organizational Storytelling, Ethics and Morality:How Stories Frame Limits of Behavior in Organizations. EJBO Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 10, 2.
Roque, A., Moreira, J. M., & Figueiredo, J. D. (2020). What do we Talk about when we Talk about Ethics? A Research Journey through the World Most Ethical Companies. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 8(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0349.0801007
Roque, A., Moreira, J. M., Dias Figueiredo, J., Albuquerque, R., & Gonçalves, H. (2020). Ethics beyond leadership: Can ethics survive bad leadership? Journal of Global Responsibility, 11(3), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-06-2019-0065
Scharmer, C. O. (2015). Teoría U Liderar desde el futuro a medida que emerge - tecnología social de la presenciación. 1st edition. Barcelona: Editorial Elefthería, S.L. Retrieved from www.editorialeleftheria.com
Scharmer, C. O. (2018). Addressing The Blind Spot - An executive summary of the new book by Otto Scharmer. 4 January. Retrieved from http://www.presencing.com/sites/default/files/page-files/Theory_U_Exec_Summary.pdf
Scharmer, O. (2018). Theory U. Presencing Institute. 3 January, Retrieved from https://www.presencing.org/#/aboutus/theory-u
Scholtens, B., & Dam, L. (2007). Cultural values and international differences in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9252-9
Schwartz, M. S. (2004). Effective Corporate Codes of Ethics: Perceptions of Code Users. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(4), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-2169-2
Stevens, B. (2008). Corporate ethical codes: Effective instruments for influencing behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9370-z
Stohl, C., Stohl, M., & Popova, L. (2009). A new generation of corporate codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 607–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0064-6
Talaulicar, T. (2009). Barriers against globalizing corporate ethics: An analysis of legal disputes on implementing u.s. codes of ethics in Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3 supl.), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0199-5
Tan, J., & Wang, L. (2011). MNC Strategic Responses to Ethical Pressure: An Institutional Logic Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0553-7
Tréguer-Felten, G. (2017). The role of translation in the cross-cultural transferability of corporate codes of conduct. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 17(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595817694659
Yin, R. K. (2001). Estudos de caso: planejamento e métodos. 2 edition. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors must be able to transfer to Harvard Deusto Business Research the rights to publish the articles. It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain the necessary permissions for the images that are covered by copyright.
Authors conserve the copyright to their own works. Contributions to Publicaciones Harvard Deusto Business Research are covered by a CC-BY (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License) license, which grants open access rights to society. Specifically, the CC-BY license permits any type of use, distribution and changes based on the article, as long as the author and original source are properly acknowledged.